BenchMine. Powered by OnlyBoth
powered by OnlyBoth
Go »
A sentence is worth 1,000 data.®
 BenchMine » Nursing Homes » Benchmarking Engine   

Benchmarking Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care in Brooklyn, NY against  

1 of 6 results Switch Audience |
|
 Share on Twitter
 
 Share on LinkedIn
 
 Share on Facebook
 OR 

To
Your name
Your email
Add a note
Send Email Cancel
MAP IT | |

 

Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care in Brooklyn, NY has the 5th-highest certified-bed occupancy rate (96.8%) among the 270 nursing homes within 20 miles. That 96.8% compares to an average of 75.6% across those 270 nursing homes.

Beating the average of 75.6% means an extra 47.8 residents.


Note: certified-bed occupancy rate =
(100 * residents in certified beds) ÷ certified beds

Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care has these standings among those 270 nursing homes:

  • certified-bed occupancy rate = 96.8% (5th-highest)

  • residents in certified beds = 217.8 (63rd-most)

  • certified beds = 225 (111th-most)

Visualize

 
 

Peers

Take Action

Recommended actions by partners, triggered by the type of insight, can be inserted here. Inquire at support@onlyboth.com.

References

  1. certified-bed occupancy rate. Higher values are better. The occupancy rate equals the residents in certified beds (restot) divided by the number of certified beds (bedcert), times 100. The rate can exceed 100%. Some nursing homes can have a combination of Medicare, Medicaid, and/or private payer beds. Certified beds tell you how many of the beds in a nursing home are Medicare and/or Medicaid beds. Refer to Glossary. To qualify for certified-bed occupancy rate, the number of residents in certified beds must be at least 40. Except where noted, all data come from the Nov 6, 2020 update at Nursing Home Compare and all changes-over-time are over two years, comparing to the Nov 1, 2018 update.
  2. within 20 miles.

    • The Latitude and Longitude data used by this application were obtained from the Google Map's geolocation API.
    • In some cases, the actual street-level addresses were not found anywhere, especially when only PO Boxes were provided, so in those cases, zip code coordinates were used. And because the average land area of a zip code is around 90 square miles, it is possible that some locations may be misrepresented.

    Except where noted, all data come from the Nov 6, 2020 update at Nursing Home Compare and all changes-over-time are over two years, comparing to the Nov 1, 2018 update.

Profile

Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care in Brooklyn, NY is owned by a for-profit corporation, in Brooklyn, NY, in zipcode 11207, is on the East Coast, Medicaid certified, Medicare certified, in the nationwide top 500 in residents in certified beds, had a deficiency in how to procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards, had a deficiency in how to provide and implement an infection prevention and control program, has a Resident Council, has automatic sprinklers in all required areas, doesn't have substantiated complaints, fines, or payment denials, had a deficiency in both health and fire safety, has a 5-star rating in both quality measures and long-stay quality measures, has a 1- or 2-star rating in each of short-stay quality measures, staffing, and registered-nurse staffing, has a 4- or 5-star rating in each of overall, quality measures, and long-stay quality measures, is worse than the nationwide mental-health averages in long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms, is better than the nationwide mental-health averages in both short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication and long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication, is worse than the nationwide hospital-related averages in short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission, is better than the nationwide hospital-related averages in each of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit, outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days, and hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days, is worse than the nationwide averages in short-stay residents who made improvements in function, were assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine, were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine, and were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission (4 total), is better than the nationwide averages in short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication and had an outpatient emergency department visit, is worse than the nationwide physical-health averages in long-stay residents who lose too much weight and were high-risk and had pressure ulcers, and is better than the nationwide physical-health averages in long-stay residents who became less able to move independently, experienced one or more falls with major injury, were physically restrained, has a urinary tract infection, had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder, were low-risk and lost control of their bowels or bladder, and needed increased help with daily activities (7 total).

 

     Numeric values:
  • incentive bonus payments per $1M in claims ($47,079)
  • total fines ($0)
  • total fines per resident ($0.00)
  • change in total fines over two years ($0)
  • long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine (96.9%)
  • certified-bed occupancy rate (96.8%)
  • long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine (93.8%)
  • short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine (74.3%)
  • short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine (52.6%)
  • low-risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder (47.6%)
  • short-stay residents who made improvements in function (47.1%)
  • short-stay residents who were rehospitalized or had an outpatient emergency department visit (29.1%)
  • long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms (29.0%)
  • short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission (22.3%)
  • high-risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers (12.4%)
  • long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication (11.1%)
  • long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased (9.9%)
  • long-stay residents who lose too much weight (8.7%)
  • long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened (6.8%)
  • short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit (6.8%)
  • long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication (2.2%)
  • short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication (1.4%)
  • long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury (0.4%)
  • long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder (0.1%)
  • long-stay residents who were physically restrained (0.0%)
  • long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection (0.0%)
  • change in health-inspection rating over two years (0 stars)
  • change in overall rating over two years (-1 star)
  • change in quality-measures rating over two years (0 stars)
  • change in residents in certified beds over two years (-2.4)
  • change in staffing rating over two years (-2 stars)
  • health-inspection rating (3 stars)
  • long-stay quality-measures rating (5 stars)
  • overall rating (4 stars)
  • quality-measures rating (5 stars)
  • registered-nurse staffing rating (2 stars)
  • RN staffing hours per resident per day (0.42)
  • short-stay quality-measures rating (2 stars)
  • staffing rating (2 stars)
  • total nurse staffing hours per resident per day (3.56)
  • change in facility-reported incidents or substantiated complaints over two years (0)
  • change in last-inspection-cycle health-deficiency score over two years (-4)
  • change in last-inspection-cycle total health-inspection score over two years (-4)
  • change in total last-inspection-cycle fire-safety deficiencies over two years (-7)
  • change in total last-inspection-cycle health deficiencies over two years (-4)
  • change in total weighted health survey score over two years (+1.7)
  • count of administration deficiencies (0)
  • count of automatic sprinkler systems deficiencies (0)
  • count of construction deficiencies (0)
  • count of corridor walls and doors deficiencies (0)
  • count of electrical deficiencies (0)
  • count of emergency plans and fire drills deficiencies (0)
  • count of emergency preparedness deficiencies (0)
  • count of environmental deficiencies (1)
  • count of exit deficiencies (1)
  • count of fire alarm systems deficiencies (0)
  • count of freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation deficiencies (0)
  • count of gas, vacuum, and electrical systems deficiencies (0)
  • count of hazardous area deficiencies (0)
  • count of illumination and emergency power deficiencies (0)
  • count of interior deficiencies (0)
  • count of laboratories deficiencies (0)
  • count of medical gases and anesthetizing areas deficiencies (0)
  • count of miscellaneous deficiencies (0)
  • count of nursing and physician services deficiencies (0)
  • count of nutrition and dietary deficiencies (1)
  • count of pharmacy service deficiencies (0)
  • count of quality of life and care deficiencies (0)
  • count of resident assessment and care planning deficiencies (0)
  • count of resident rights deficiencies (0)
  • count of services deficiencies (0)
  • count of smoke deficiencies (0)
  • count of smoking regulations deficiencies (0)
  • facility-reported incidents (2)
  • facility-reported incidents or substantiated complaints (2)
  • facility-reported incidents or substantiated complaints per 100 residents in a certified bed (0.9)
  • fines (0)
  • health deficiencies during the last inspection cycle (2)
  • health deficiencies from complaint surveys during the last inspection cycle (0)
  • health deficiencies from the standard survey during the last inspection cycle (2)
  • health-deficiency score during the last inspection cycle (24)
  • hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days (1.48)
  • outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days (0.70)
  • payment denials (0)
  • substantiated complaints (0)
  • total health-inspection score during the last inspection cycle (24)
  • total number of fire-safety deficiencies (1)
  • total number of health deficiencies (2)
  • total penalties (0)
  • total weighted health survey score during the last 3 inspection cycles (23.3)
  • certified beds (225)
  • change in RN staffing hours per resident per day (-0.14)
  • change in total nurse staffing hours per resident per day (-1.21)
  • LPN staffing hours per resident per day (0.66)
  • Nurse Aide staffing hours per resident per day (2.52)
  • residents in certified beds (217.8)
  • years certified for Medicare/Medicaid (31.9)

Global References

Create PDF Report for Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care in Brooklyn, NY

Your feedback, please.

Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health Care in Brooklyn, NY has the 5th-highest certified-bed occupancy rate (96.8%) among the 270 nursing homes within 20 miles. That 96.8% compares to an average of 75.6% across those 270 nursing homes.
How was this insight?
How are we doing? Where could we improve?

How do you feel right now?
(Optional) Please include an e-mail address to contact with any clarifications.

Send Cancel
product tour