Powered by OnlyBoth
Go »
A sentence is worth 1,000 data.®
 Counties » Benchmarking Engine   

Benchmarking Lincoln County in ME against  

1 of 42 results
|
 Share on Twitter
 
 Share on LinkedIn
 
 Share on Facebook
 OR 

To
Your name
Your email
Add a note
Send Email Cancel
|

 

Lincoln County in ME has the lowest deep-poverty rate (3.5%) among all the 16 Maine counties. That 3.5% compares to an average of 5.5% across those 16 counties.

Visualize

 
 

Peers

References

  1. deep-poverty rate. Lower values are better. Deep poverty rate for all ages, 2010-2014. Source: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/atlas-of-rural-and-small-town-america.aspx.

Profile

Lincoln County in ME is in Maine, is in the East Coast states, high in natural amenities, high in creative professions, got worse or bottomed out on all the obesity and diabetes change metrics (4 of these; each county needs at least 3 with actual values to qualify), is recreation-dependent, saw little change in onshore oil production, saw little change in natural-gas production, is better than the nationwide averages in each of overall obesity, male obesity, female obesity, change over 4 years in overall obesity, and change over 4 years in male obesity, is better than the nationwide income averages in each of median household income, per-capita income, poverty rate, poverty rate for children age 0-17, deep-poverty rate, and deep-poverty rate for children age 0-17, and is better than the nationwide averages in adults of age 25+ with each of a bachelors degree or higher, less than a bachelors degree, less than an associate degree, no college credits, and no high school diploma or ged.

 

     Numeric values:
  • median household income ($47,905)
  • per-capita income ($28,798)
  • median rent for a 3-bedroom unit ($1,181)
  • median rent for a 1-bedroom unit ($798)
  • median rent for a 0-bedroom (studio/efficiency) unit ($749)
  • white non-Hispanic population (97.0%)
  • proportion of veterans who are male (94.4%)
  • owner-occupied housing (81.3%)
  • adults of age 25+ with less than a bachelors degree (67.7%)
  • adults of age 25+ with less than an associate degree (59.5%)
  • residents employed in services (54.3%)
  • adults of age 25+ with no college credits (39.3%)
  • change in median rent for a 0-bedroom (studio/efficiency) unit over the last decade (+36.0%)
  • adults of age 25+ with a bachelors degree or higher (32.3%)
  • change in median rent for a 3-bedroom unit over the last decade (+31.0%)
  • change in median rent for a 1-bedroom unit over the last decade (+30.0%)
  • female obesity (24.6%)
  • obesity (24.3%)
  • male obesity (24%)
  • religious adherents (22.20%)
  • population age 65 or older (21.5%)
  • poverty rate for children age 0-17 (19.3%)
  • residents who are veterans (12.8%)
  • adults of age 65+ living alone (12.5%)
  • poverty rate (11.7%)
  • farmland (10.6%)
  • Mainline Protestants (10.40%)
  • enrollment frequency in a health plan through HealthCare.gov (9.50%)
  • residents employed in manufacturing (9.1%)
  • residents who have diabetes (9%)
  • female-headed family households (8.5%)
  • Catholics (7.90%)
  • adults of age 25+ with no high school diploma or GED (7.3%)
  • deep-poverty rate for children age 0-17 (7.3%)
  • unemployment rate for veterans (6.1%)
  • proportion of veterans who are female (5.6%)
  • change, relative to its home state, in per-capita income (+5.4%)
  • residents employed in government (4.9%)
  • change over 4 years in the prevalence of female obesity (+4.8%)
  • residents employed in agriculture or other resource-based industries (4.7%)
  • change over 4 years in the prevalence of obesity (+4.5%)
  • unemployment rate (4.4%)
  • change over 4 years in the prevalence of male obesity (+4.1%)
  • deep-poverty rate (3.5%)
  • Evangelical Protestants (3.10%)
  • foreign-born population (3.0%)
  • United Methodists (3.00%)
  • change over 9 years in the prevalence of diabetes (+2%)
  • European-born population (1.3%)
  • multi-racial population (1.1%)
  • Hispanic population (0.8%)
  • change in population from 2010-2015 due to net inbound migration (+0.8%)
  • non-English speaking households (0.7%)
  • difference in obesity prevalence among women over men (0.6%)
  • Mormons (0.51%)
  • change in population from 2010-2015 due to net international immigration (+0.5%)
  • Asian population (0.5%)
  • change, relative to its home state, in the net inbound migration rate (+0.5%)
  • black non-Hispanic population (0.3%)
  • Native American non-Hispanic population (0.3%)
  • Evangelical Lutherans (0.30%)
  • change in unemployment rate over the last 8 years (+0.2%)
  • Caribbean-born population (0.1%)
  • Mexican-born population (0.0%)
  • Central or South American-born population (0.0%)
  • African-born population (0.0%)
  • Asian-born population (0.0%)
  • difference in obesity prevalence among men over women (-0.6%)
  • change in population from 2010-2015 (-1.4%)
  • change, relative to its home state, in the poverty rate (-2.3%)
  • change in unemployment rate over the last 4 years (-3.4%)
  • average household size (2.3)
  • enrollees in a health plan through HealthCare.gov (3,218)
  • land area (455.8 sq miles)
  • population in 2015 (33,969)
  • total domestic water use (1.70 Mgal/day)
  • total domestic water use per capita (50.00 gallons/day)
  • total water usage for all purposes (2.50 Mgal/day)

Global References

Create PDF Report for Lincoln County in ME

Your feedback, please.

Lincoln County in ME has the lowest deep-poverty rate (3.5%) among all the 16 Maine counties. That 3.5% compares to an average of 5.5% across those 16 counties.
How was this insight?
How are we doing? Where could we improve?

How do you feel right now?
(Optional) Please include an e-mail address to contact with any clarifications.

Send Cancel
product tour