BenchMine. Powered by OnlyBoth
powered by OnlyBoth
Go »
A sentence is worth 1,000 data.®
 Counties » Benchmarking Engine   

Benchmarking Ziebach County, South Dakota against  

1 of 10 results
|
 Share on Twitter
 
 Share on LinkedIn
 
 Share on Facebook
 OR 

To
Your name
Your email
Add a note
Send Email Cancel
|

 

Ziebach County, South Dakota has the 3rd-most adult obesity (41.40%) among the 66 South Dakota counties. That 41.40% compares to an average of 31.28% and standard deviation of 3.70% across those 66 counties.

Reaching the average of 31.28% would imply a decrease of 278.8 obese adults over time, with an estimated saving of $25,715,116 based on a lifetime societal and public-health cost of $92,235 per obese adult (see References below).

Ziebach County, South Dakota has these related standings among those 66 peer counties:

  • adult obesity = 41.40% (3rd-most)

  • adult diabetes = 16.7% (4th-most)

  • adults who don't eat enough daily fruits & vegetables = 83.80% (19th-most, tied)

  • food environment index = 2.0 (4th-lowest)

  • local food outlets per 100,000 in population = 0.00 (the fewest, tied)

  • population without nearby access to a large grocery store = 37.38% (29th-least)

Visualize

 
 

Peers

Taking Action

Insert recommendations for community action or improvement, based on the highlighted measures and their comparative outcomes, and optionally dependent on a specified geography or other attribute.

References

  1. adult obesity. Lower values are better. Percentage of adults who are obese (BMI of 30+). Source is CDC, 2013. The estimate of $92,235 per person for the lifetime societal and public-health cost of obesity is reported in this article.

Profile

Ziebach County, South Dakota is in South Dakota, is better than the nationwide crime averages in both property crime and violent crime, is worse than the nationwide household averages in each of household income, homeownership, overcrowding, internet access, housing costs, and home heating, is worse than the nationwide employment averages in each of job variety, job proximity, and new-business growth rate, is worse than the nationwide adult-disease averages in both obesity and diabetes, and is better than the nationwide public-safety averages in each of airborne cancer risk, air quality, and flood hazard.

 

     Numeric values:
  • median household income ($35,119)
  • public-school spending per student ($16,432)
  • average weekly wage ($638.00)
  • per-capita spending on police and fire protection ($58.19)
  • unsafe drinking water exposure (100%)
  • adults who don't eat enough daily fruits & vegetables (83.80%)
  • labor-force participation (68.00%)
  • high-school graduation rate (64.96%)
  • youth who live within 5 miles of a public school (53.43%)
  • homeownership rate (53.2%)
  • racial integration (49.00%)
  • adult obesity (41.40%)
  • poverty rate (39.55%)
  • population without nearby access to a large grocery store (37.38%)
  • population living close to emergency facilities (34.84%)
  • pre-school enrollment (33.02%)
  • adults of age 18+ who smoke tobacco (33.01%)
  • households where housing costs (mortgage or rent and utilities) exceed 30% of household income (26.79%)
  • adults who self-report fair or poor general health within the last 30 days (26.69%)
  • population without health insurance (26.26%)
  • households that receive public-assistance income (25.68%)
  • population age 25+ with an Associate Degree or higher (25.25%)
  • adults who did NOT take part in leisure-time physical activity or exercise in the past month (24.80%)
  • heart disease among older adults (21.24%)
  • teenage birth rate (21.05%)
  • 4th-grade students who are proficient in English Language Arts (19.00%)
  • households with utility gas or electric for home heating (16.94%)
  • adult diabetes (16.7%)
  • households with no vehicle (12.47%)
  • households with internet access (11.60%)
  • overcrowded households (11.36%)
  • newborns with low birth weight (8.03%)
  • workers who commute 60 minutes or more (6.50%)
  • civilian labor-force unemployment (4.2%)
  • youth of ages 16-19 who are neither working nor enrolled in school (3.90%)
  • households in a FEMA-designated flood hazard area (3.86%)
  • land area covered by tree canopy, weighted by population (3.56%)
  • relative disparity in unemployment rates among the disabled, compared to the total population (0.36%)
  • new-business growth rate (0.00%)
  • tax returns that claim adult education tax credits (0.00%)
  • vacant houses (0.00%)
  • change in median household value (-5.60%)
  • affordable housing relative to low-income population (-51.72)
  • food environment index (2.0)
  • jobs within a 45-minute commute by car (14)
  • local food outlets per 100,000 in population (0.00)
  • nonprofits per 100,000 population (25.0)
  • variety of industries among available jobs (0.18)
  • walkability index (4.11)
  • airborne cancer risk per million in population (16.62)
  • car crash fatalities per 100,000 population (28.29)
  • days per month that adults self-report 'not good' mental health (4.29)
  • preventable hospital admissions per 100,000 population (3,150)
  • property crimes per 100,000 population (140.85)
  • relative disparity in income among blacks and hispanics, compared to whites (0.46)
  • relative disparity in pollution exposure among blacks, hispanics, and other, compared to whites (2.36)
  • relative disparity in premature death among blacks and hispanics, compared to whites (0.00)
  • risk of developing serious respiratory complications per 10,000 in population (0.37)
  • very-hot days per year (7)
  • violent crimes per 100,000 population (23.47)
  • CMS-certified beds within active hospitals per 1,000 population (0.00)
  • first responders per 1,000 population (0.320)
  • population (2,756)
  • primary-care doctors per 100,000 population (0.00)

Global References

Create PDF Report for Ziebach County, South Dakota

Your feedback, please.

Ziebach County, South Dakota has the 3rd-most adult obesity (41.40%) among the 66 South Dakota counties. That 41.40% compares to an average of 31.28% and standard deviation of 3.70% across those 66 counties.
How was this insight?
How are we doing? Where could we improve?

How do you feel right now?
(Optional) Please include an e-mail address to contact with any clarifications.

Send Cancel